Apple – Samsung battle is no more a new issue. In regular interval of time either of them are noticed filing lawsuit against the other. The latest legal meet among these two giants was regarding iPad infringement. Apple had filed a lawsuit saying that Samsung has copied their tablet.
The judge delivered a decision in quite a fascinating manner. Firstly he declared that, Apple should now run ads supporting that Samsung hadn’t copied their iPad. Well, this could have been the expected one. But as Chris Matyszczyk, Judge Colin Birss really seemed to have character as he followed up with declaration that Samsung couldn’t possibly have copied the iPad because Samsung’s products are simply “not as cool.”
What’s your take in Birss view? Do you really think Samsung is that dumb? Well, no offence to Samsung tab fans, but that’s what Colin Birss suggest. Now, leaving Mr. Birss aside let’s talk about the ads now that Apple has to run on its UK website supporting Samsung didn’t copy iPad. But how are they going to make it?
Chris Matyszczyk has thought to give some help to them. Here are some of his suggestion.
No 1: SAMSUNG DIDN’T COPY THE iPAD BECAUSE THEY’RE JUST NOT COOL ENOUGH
No 2: WE’RE PROUD TO ANNOUNCE iPHONE 5 IS COMING SOON. SAMSUNG COULDN’T COPY THAT ANY BETTER THAN THEY COULD COPY THE iPAD.
No 3: HERE’S TO THE CRAZY ONES WHO THOUGHT THAT SAMSUNG HAD COPIED THE iPAD.
As far as Apple’s rivalry with Samsung is concerned, it will certainly be near to impossible for the Cupertino giants to apologize. Adopting some similar ads as suggested by Mr. Matyszczyk might make the work done for Apple.
via cnet
